Skip to content
Exercise Library

Cross-Body Arm Swings

Upper Bodyisolation·desk-friendly

53

/100

low (0.34)
Movement Demo
Decision Guide

Best when...

  • You need something you can do near your desk without much setup.
  • You feel stiff from sitting and want to undo desk posture quickly.
  • Your energy is dipping and you want a more activating break.

Not ideal when...

  • You need something substantially more intense or more workout-like.

Pairs well with...

a short walk or lower-body movement after a long typing block

Better than X when...

Longer break routines when you only have 60 seconds and need immediate value.

Office-clothes alternative

Sit-to-Stand or Wall Push-Up are easy alternatives when you want something even more office-friendly.

Movement Profile
Muscular Demand
14

Targets pectorals, deltoids, latissimus dorsi

Metabolic Cost
51

MET 2.6 (modeled), 0.7x walking

Mobility Value
63

Joint ROM: 72%, posture benefit: 52%

Desk Practicality
92

Can be performed at or near a desk

Muscle Activations

deltoids

34%modeled

pectorals

28%modeled

trapezius

18%modeled

latissimus dorsi

16%modeled
Energy Estimate
~3.2kcal

for 20 reps · roughly 0.7 min of brisk walking for a 70 kg person

Cross-Body Arm Swings scores 53/100, strongest in desk practicality. Suitable for a desk break.

Caveats
  • Metabolic cost varies with body weight and fitness level
  • mobility value, desk practicality, muscular demand are estimated, not directly measured
  • Limited research data for this exercise
  • Study populations may not represent sedentary desk workers
Data Provenance

Measured (0)

    Derived (1)

    • caloric expenditure

    Modeled (8)

    • MET value
    • deltoids activation
    • pectorals activation
    • trapezius activation
    • latissimus dorsi activation
    • joint ROM
    • posture correction
    • desk practicality
    References

    2011 Compendium of Physical Activities

    Barbara E. Ainsworth, William L. Haskell, ... et al.

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2011) · Vol. 43(8) · pp. 1575–1581

    Established MET reference values for common activities